I keep having nightmares about one possible future: biofuel
hell. Clearly, they are visions sent by
ancestral spirits, and they are meant to be shared. Perhaps they will inspire writers, movie
makers, and other creative people to produce healing, mind-altering work. Perhaps they will inspire contemplation and
sincere conversations. At this point,
I’m just going to dump a bag of jigsaw puzzle pieces on the table. See what you can do with them.
During World War II, when gasoline was rationed, or
unavailable to civilians, hundreds of thousands of vehicles in dozens of
nations were converted to run on wood gas.
Car owners installed equipment that weighed 400 to 500 pounds (180 to 225
kg), plus another 50 to 100 pounds (22 to 45 kg) of fuel — wood chips or
charcoal.
In the firebox, fuel was ignited to release the gasses,
primarily nitrogen and carbon monoxide.
Carbon monoxide was the flammable and explosive energy source. It was also extremely poisonous, much to the
delight of morticians. Many folks drove
with their windows rolled down. The gas
contained twice as much non-flammable nitrogen as carbon monoxide, which meant
that it was not a high-powered fuel.
In wartime Germany,
500,000 wood gas vehicles were in use, including cars, buses, tractors,
motorcycles, ships, and trains. These
vehicles were also used in Denmark, Sweden, France, Finland, Switzerland,
Russia, Japan, Korea, and Australia.
Charcoal-powered
cars were developed in China in 1931, and they remained popular into the
1950s. Before World War II, the French
were consuming 50,000 tons of wood for vehicle fuel. This increased to 500,000 tons by 1943.
Readers who want to get a better feel for what life was like
in an era of wood-fuelled transport should read Producer Gas & the Australian Motorist
by Don Bartlett. It’s a 26 page discussion
of what Australian drivers experienced during World War II, when little
gasoline was available.
Today, rising gasoline prices are renewing interest in
wood-power. Modern
technology allows wood-powered cars to cruise at 68 mph (110 km/h), with a
driving range of 62 miles (100 km), consuming 66 pounds (30 kg) of wood. There’s just one little drawback with
biofuels. “If we were to convert every
vehicle, or even just a significant number, to wood gas, all the trees in the
world would be gone and we would die of hunger because all agricultural land
would be sacrificed for energy crops.
Indeed, the woodmobile caused severe deforestation in France during the
Second World War.” France was not alone. Remember that there were far, far fewer cars
in the world 70 years ago.
Americans are fiercely defensive about their sacred guns, but
this passion is trivial in comparison to our God-given right to drive
energy-guzzling motorized wheelchairs.
Most of us would rather be stoned to death by an angry crowd of Taliban than
switch to bikes or buses. Have no doubt
that when gas rises above $20 or $30 a gallon, or when filling stations are out
of gas for days or weeks at a time, countless hucksters will fall out of the
sky, selling wood gas conversion units — and every one of them will be bought.
Air travel is a dinosaur industry, and will likely be
replaced by rail. The University of
Minnesota is working with the Coalition for Sustainable Rail (CSR) and the
Sustainable Rail International (SRI) to create powerful, fast, clean, and
modern steam locomotives. “If the demonstration project is successful,
however, trains could be merely a starting point for biocoal-fueled steam
power.”
The Natural Resources Research Institute at the University of
Minnesota has invented biocoal. They feed “cellulosic biomaterial” (like dead
trees) into a torrefaction process and turn it into black pellets. The raw material is exposed to high
temperatures, pulverized, and then formed into fuel pellets. Unlike wood pellets, torrefied biomass
pellets will not absorb water, so they can be stored outdoors. The pellets have the same energy content as
coal, with no sulfur or heavy metals.
Tests in the US, Europe, and Japan have shown that torrefied
biomass can successfully be used in coal-fired power
plants with few modifications.
Several plants for manufacturing torrefied biomass should be in
operation by 2013. This fuel has a
higher energy density than wood pellets or wood chips.
Here’s a
gem: “Biomass gasification is being considered as a possible technology for
converting at least 10 million acres of Texas brush into biofuel, according to
Dr. Jim Ansley, Texas AgriLife Research rangeland ecologist in Vernon.” Vast areas of mesquite and juniper wood are
just going to waste, and need to be put to productive use.
This winter, many Greeks
are heating with wood, since the tax on heating oil rose 450 percent. Slimeballs are busy illegally cutting trees
in national forests. At night, people
are going into Athens parks and cutting limbs and felling trees. High levels of smoke are sending pollution
readings far beyond danger levels.
What’s odd is that this hasn’t been a cold winter. In Athens, nighttime temperatures typically
dip into the low 40s (F). That’s warmer
than where I live.
I’ve run my heater maybe four hours all winter. I’m a writer, and writers have no choice but
to live on nothing. Every morning I get
out of bed and put on a tee-shirt, heavy sweatshirt, fleece jacket, thick
hooded sweatshirt, insulated cap, blue jeans, socks and shoes, and I’m ready
for a long day of work. Writers know
that our sense of coldness is culturally programmed — it’s all in your head — and
has little to do with our animal bodies.
Once we understand this vital secret, we can live with far greater
comfort, at far lower temperatures, at far less expense.
So anyway, as we move beyond the bubble of cheap energy, we
will certainly burn more biomass. Will
we use biomass energy to fuel our wood stove, cars, tractors, trucks,
railroads, and power grid? No doubt
we’ll give it a good try. It’s clearly
an insane idea, but it’s hard for us to imagine a life without our addictions.
Anyone who has read John Perlin’s essential book, A Forest Journey,
clearly understands the folly of running an industrial civilization on
wood. It’s been tried many times, and
always failed, because it wiped out a resource that the civilization depended
on for its survival — just like we’re doing today with fossil fuels.
Jared Diamond is a geography professor at UCLA. He has given many lectures on the Easter
Island story. His students always have a
difficult time grasping the image of natives cutting down the last tree on the
island. “That's simply not possible —
people aren’t that stupid!” Well,
unfortunately, yes we are, is Diamond's conclusion in his book, Collapse.
Today, we’re moving in the direction toward a treeless planet
— Easter Island II. Ten years from now,
somewhere in Nebraska, there may be a morbidly obese accountant who drives his
wood-powered F350 4X4 monster truck two miles to work every day. His fuel box is empty. In his back yard is the last living tree on
Earth.
OK, so those are the puzzle pieces.
9 comments:
In a "macro-anthropological" sense, is there perhapsnnot some element of "inevitability," of "predeterminism," that the not-so-long arc of human evolvement was "destined" to bring us to this fatalistic, societally suicidal predicament? Something inherent in the motivations that drive or shape human behavior? Hmmmmm.
Vern, this is what I've been writing about for the last two months or so. Dilworth called it the Vicious Cycle Princple. Wells, Ehrlich, and Wright see it as a runaway train of cultural evolution that's been gathering steam for 50,000 to 70,000 years. We're smart enough to override the trend. I'm not sure we will.
Instead of Easter Island II, I’m liking economic collapse coupled with a few good drought years and a super-bug that has evolved beyond all antibiotics. Fast and relatively painless would be best, but reasonably thorough would also be good. We’re going down, anyway, so why not leave a little life support for the rest of the Community of Life on our way out? I don’t mean that we could prevent the domino effect once it kicks in, anyway, but why not embrace and welcome it as the best thing to happen in a long time for All Our Relations? Maybe next time around the Life Force won’t be so inclined to experiment with opposable thumbs, culture, and an oversized brain. Looked at from a distance, the human era will have been just another minor setback in the Project of Life. A few million years from now, the Earth will again be a garden planet rich in abundance and biodiversity—and that is what it’s always been all about!
Your writing is always a pleasure to read.
I would ride a bike everywhere, except I don't want to die getting hit by a car on the road (originally paved for bicycles, mind you!) so I have a damned smokin', chokin' automobile. At least it's old, no insurance (except for liability,) and costs little except gas.
Regarding "sacred guns:" What is "sacred" about the Second Amendment is Egalitarian Power-Sharing. Such an egalitarian political arrangement stems much from the colonists admiring the non-hierarchical power sharing in the Egalitarian Non-State eastern woodlands Indian tribes, as James Axtell documents.
As Spencer Wells points out, in the last several hundred years we have made a major shift from mythos to logos.
Logos tells us that trees are a resource to be exploited for our purposes (at best to be "managed" responsibly).
Mythos informs us that trees are our closest cousins in the Web of Life. Like us, they stand vertically, with roots deeply embedded in the earth (our past) and with limbs reaching up to the sky and out to the horizon (our future) - providing a vital link between heaven and earth and maintaining balance and harmony.
Gary, yeah the notion of slow collapse is losing a lot of its shine. It's hard to see that we'd do anything useful with the extra time. But I'm not in charge.
Ivy Mike, I once spent a year near San Francisco where it was suicidal to walk or bike. Nothing but blind curves, with few sidewalks.
In terms of guns, Google "Saint Bartholomew's Day Massacre." Some think that the second amendment was demanded by Huguenots, who had been slaughtered in great numbers by fundamentalist Catholic terrorists. Never again!
Riversong, OK I'll go with the mythos. It sounds more sane.
Post a Comment