His answer to both questions was population pressure. Our preferred foods decreased as our numbers
increased. In the good old days, the
preferred food for hunter-gatherers everywhere was large game. It took far less time to kill a six-ton wooly
mammoth than it took to kill six tons of rabbits, rats, or snails. As long as large game was available, we were
delighted to put the forks to them.
When large game became scarce, adventurous souls migrated
into uninhabited regions, in search of nourishing four-legged banquets. Because we were so clever with tool making,
we learned how to survive in almost any type of ecosystem, wet or dry, roasting
or frozen. Eventually, we ran out of
uninhabited regions, and large game became scarce everywhere. Before long, less-preferred foods began to
look like a delicious alternative to starvation.
When large game was our primary preferred food, the planet’s
carrying capacity was maybe 15 million people, Cohen estimated. He believed that the transition to
agriculture had three phases: (1) large game, (2) small game, aquatic
resources, more plant foods, and (3) domesticated foods. The archaeological record in most regions generally
supports this.
Climate change also played a role. As the ice ages passed, the weather warmed
up, and tundra ecosystems were replaced by forests. Large tundra critters became hungry homeless
ruffians, and many of them staggered toward the exit. Forest critters like aurochs, deer, and pigs
were not animals that lived in vast herds.
Hunting them required more effort.
By and by, we zipped past Peak Large Game.
Cohen found plenty of evidence that the trend throughout the
long human journey had been one of population growth, slow but fairly
steady. Some societies did a good job of
voluntarily limiting their numbers, and others didn’t. Some surely lived in balance for multiple
generations. Joseph Birdsell estimated
that during the Pleistocene, 15 to 50 percent of all live births were
eliminated via infanticide. Deliberate stability
was better than growth-driven starvation, but stability was a slippery
ideal. In an ever-changing world,
stability can only be temporary.
The notion of carrying capacity sets a firm limit on how many
deer an ecosystem can support. For
humans, carrying capacity limits were more flexible, because we could digest a
wide variety of plant and animal parts. When
rhinoceros steaks were no longer available, we began eating more plant foods, smaller
game, marine mammals, salmon, shellfish, birds, seeds, nuts, snails, reptiles,
insects, and so on. It was more work,
but it kept us fed, and our numbers slowly kept growing.
This transition from a Class A diet to a Class B diet
occurred in all societies, in various forms, and it increased the carrying
capacity for humans. You can guess what
happened next. We eventually thumped
against the ceiling once again, despite our new high-tech nets, bows and
arrows, traps, weirs, fishhooks, harpoons, and so on. What now?
Our options included die-off, bloody conflict, effective family planning,
and/or a Class C diet.
Fate tossed the dice, and a crap diet won. Agriculture was not a brilliant
discovery. A million years ago, everyone
knew what happened when seeds were planted.
Everyone knew that tending plants was laborious. In a world of abundant animal food, most
plant foods were held in low regard.
“People worldwide eat meat and various fruits when they can, and eat
cereals and tubers only when they must,” said Cohen. A cereal-based diet had many nutritional
drawbacks, and nothing was more excruciatingly dull than a diet that majors in
hot porridge.
We routinely fail to appreciate the elegant time-proven
culture of wild foragers. They ate a
wide variety of nutritious wild plants that evolution had fine-tuned to survive
the various quirks of the local ecosystem.
Because they weren’t dependent for survival on just two or three
domesticated plant foods, Bushmen could easily survive a three-year drought
that hammered nearby ranchers. Foragers
were healthier people, because wild foods were more nutritious, and the nomadic
lifestyle discouraged disease.
Farming was backbreaking work. It required tilling, planting, weeding, and
watering — months of effort invested before the payoff, if any. The threats of drought, deluge, frost,
insects, disease, fire, hail, and winds could zap a thriving crop at any
time. When the grain was ripe, there was
a window of opportunity for harvesting it, which sometimes only lasted a few
days. If you missed it, you were doomed. The stalks had to be cut and then
threshed. If the grains were not loose
enough, some roasting was needed.
Storage pits or granaries had to be built, and constantly
defended against assorted moochers and thugs.
Before storing it, the grain had to be parched to prevent germination,
and to discourage molds and fungi. Prior
to cooking, grain had to be pulverized by pounding or grinding. In the New World, living on maize required
even more work.
Population pressure propelled the spread of agriculture to
every suitable habitat. Small societies
of hunter-gatherers were helpless to oppose the growing onslaught of belligerent
mobs of porridge fiends and bread heads.
In recent times, we’ve discovered how to use soil to convert petroleum
into edible food-like substances. Today
we’ve munched our way deeply into the realm of Class D foods, loaded with
highly refined carbs, oceans of empty calories.
We’ve succeeded in temporarily stretching our carrying
capacity to 7 billion, but little stretch remains before the inevitable
snapback. Even ghastly Class D foods
will slam into firm limits — Peak Cheap Energy, Peak Fertilizer, cropland
destruction, desertification, and the certainty that industrial agriculture has
an expiration date. Somewhere down the
road, climate change is likely to eliminate most or all forms of farming. The unusually stable climate of the last
10,000 years is a freak.
Observing the human journey from Cohen’s mountaintop, we can
see above the fog of myths, and the big picture comes into better focus. Even the hunter-gatherer way of life, as it
occurred, was not sustainable over the long run. If we had remained in balance, agriculture
and civilization would have never happened.
Human efforts at voluntarily limiting population have not been 100
percent effective, and this failure has been amplified by our skills at
neutralizing the traditional man-eating predators that provided essential mob
control. A herd of seven billion is a
time bomb.
On a misty morning, a group of chimps sits at the edge of the
forest, gazing at us. They are our
closest relatives, and for millions of years they have not blundered into tool
addiction, domestication, or population explosions. Predators are always free to invite the less
alert to lunch. Wild chimps are still
healthy, happy, and sustainable. They
wonder how we became so lost and confused.
It’s never pleasant to watch old friends self-destruct from devastating
addictions. What happened? Was it necessary to trash the planet? Please!
Get a grip! We miss you! Come home!
Humankind is suffocating in toxic myths. Critical thinking is a powerful antidote, and
it’s a vast, barely explored continent.
In the coming decades, one way or another, the lights will be going out
on civilization, as we know it. In the
time remaining, it would be wise to bury as many of these myths as possible, so
that they will not poison the minds of future generations, if any. It’s time for learning, thinking, and
remembering. We have many dragons to
slay before we can recover our long-lost treasure, a reality-based
understanding of where we came from, and who we truly are. Our greatest need is for healthy new visions. It’s time to go home.
Cohen, Mark Nathan, The
Food Crisis in Prehistory — Overpopulation and the Origins of Agriculture,
Yale University Press, New Haven, 1977.