As I write these words, I’m wearing sweatpants and an old
faded shirt. I suspect that most readers
are also wearing clothes. Oddly, humans are
the only animals that make and wear clothing.
Our ancestors evolved in the tropics of Mother Africa, where it was so
warm that many folks preferred the comfortable and practical bare naked
look. Evolution spent several million
years fine tuning our bodies for life on the savannah, and the result was an
excellent design.
After humans migrated out of Africa, and colonized tropical
Asia and Australia, some folks decided to wander north. It was a cool place to live, and the farther north
they wandered, the cooler it got. In
snow country, tropical primates were like fish out of water. Brrrr!
They wrapped themselves in animal hides, lived in protective shelters,
and huddled around warm campfires.
Over time, they learned how to cut and sew hides into custom
tailored clothing that provided better protection for both humans and body lice. Eventually, they learned how to spin plant
fibers into thread, which could be used for stitching seams together. In the Republic of Georgia, researchers have
found spun and dyed fragments of flax fibers that were 34,000 years old. At some point, folks learned how to weave
thread into fabric. We aren’t sure
when. Cloth made from natural fibers is
perfectly biodegradable, leaving few clues for modern archaeologists.
Kassia St Clair wrote an interesting book about fabric, The Golden Thread. It’s not a comprehensive history, but a
collection of snapshots — linen wrapped mummies in Egypt, the silk monopoly in
China, wool production in medieval England, slavery and the rise of cotton,
synthetic fibers, and so on.
My great-great-grandmother, Sarah Cleaton Rees, was a
handloom weaver in central Wales, and so were many of her female kinfolk and
neighbors. Flannel was made from wool
produced by herds of sheep grazing on the surrounding deforested hillsides. Prior to power looms and factories, millions
of women spent much of their lives spinning, weaving, and sewing in their
homes, where they could also tend to their children.
I learned about St Clair’s book by reading a fascinating
essay, No
Wool, No Vikings. My ancestors also
include Vikings from the west coast of Norway, where the homesteads were
scattered across numerous rocky islands.
Boats were how they got around.
Sheltered deep water harbors were not common, so boats were designed to
ride high in the water, so they could stop in shallow places, or on beaches. Early boats were propelled by paddles or
oars.
Sails were not used until clever folks learned how to add
keels to boat bottoms. Keels made wind
powered sea travel possible. Large, sea
worthy, shallow draft boats with sails set the stage for the Viking era —
several centuries of rowdy raiding, pillaging, bloodshed, and colonizing that
rocked northern Europe.
These new boats totally surprised many communities that had
formerly been safe and secure for centuries.
In A.D. 98, Tacitus
wrote about the Suiones, who lived along the Swedish coastline. For them, the sea provided an invincible
defensive barrier. It was impossible for
enemies to attack them by water. For the first time, Viking
ships made many safe places vulnerable to violent surprise attacks.
While history recorded the names and sagas of some heroic
male warriors, it disregarded the hard working women who made the Viking era
possible. The adventurous lads were
attired in wool from head to toe, slept under wool blankets, and traveled long
distances in boats with woolen sails.
This required large numbers of sheep, and enormous amounts of tedious human
labor. The wool of 18 sheep was needed
for each blanket. It took two highly
skilled women more than a year to make a typical square sail.
Viking sails were another revolutionary turning point in the
human saga. They enabled Scandinavians
to cross the Atlantic and establish settlements, like L’Anse aux Meadows in
Newfoundland, Canada. In Viking times,
most of humankind spent their entire lives fairly close to their place of
birth. Imagine gaining the ability to
sail to unknown lands more than a thousand miles away. This was a mind-blowing possibility. It rubbished the traditional perception of
space and limits.
Long distance sea travel flung open a ghastly Pandora’s
Box. Sailing ships enabled aggressive
conquerors to colonize vast regions around the world. Environmental history is loaded with horror
stories of pathogens delivered by long distance sea travel — potato blight,
anthrax, Dutch elm disease, chestnut blight, white-nose fungus, bubonic plague,
smallpox, cholera, typhoid, yellow fever, influenza, and countless others. Millions of unlucky indigenous people were
forcibly absorbed into oppressive alien systems.
Anyway, wool was a life preserver in snow country. The notion of “no wool, no Vikings” can be
expanded to “no wool, no Britons, Saxons, Scots, Picts, Teutons, Gauls,
Vandals, etc.” Prior to the nineteenth
century, clothing was the product of extremely labor-intensive processes. For hardworking common folks, clothing was
precious, and carefully kept mended and patched. Many likely owned little more than what they
were wearing. Like moon explorers, wool
space suits enabled tropical primates to survive in chilly life-threatening
environments.
In the eighteenth century cotton began displacing wool. Large cotton plantations emerged in the
American south, where legions of slaves enjoyed miserable lives. Power looms and cotton gins sharply reduced
the labor needed to produce fabric.
Cotton remained the dominant fabric until the 1970s, when synthetic
fibers rose to dominance — rayon, nylon, polyester, and so on.
In recent decades, polyester clothing has shifted from cruddy,
stinky, and creepy to comfortable, practical, and very cheap. It’s made from petrochemicals, which arouse
the snarling displeasure of Big Mama Nature.
A lot of the apparel sold at stores in your community is made by poor
women who work long days, in nasty conditions, and maybe earn $37 per
month. The apparel industry is the world’s
biggest employer of women, of whom only two percent earn a living wage.
As the human herd grows, more folks enter the consumer class,
and clever marketers wickedly accelerate the pace at which super-trendy styles suddenly
become horribly uncool. So, the demand
for new clothing accelerates. “In 2010,
for example, it was estimated that 150 billion garments were stitched together,
enough to provide each person alive with twenty new articles of clothing,”
according to St Clair. “For the first
time in human history, the vast majority of fabric being made has become
disposable, something to be consumed and thrown away within weeks or months of
being made. Synthetic fibers made this
possible.”
Marc
Bain reported that the future of clothing is plastic (synthetic). Wool has become an endangered fiber. Cotton production experienced modest growth
since 1980, and has now plateaued. Polyester
zoomed past cotton in 2007. In 1980, its
production was 5.8 million tons, rising to 34 million tons in 2007, and is
projected to soar to 99.8 million tons by 2025.
It’s daunting to contemplate the future of clothing. Wool production is limited by the availability
of grazing land, and the need for much manual labor. It seems impossible that the huge human
herd can go back to dressing in wool. Cotton
production requires cropland, fertilizer, extra-large doses of pesticides and
water, and lots of energy-guzzling machinery.
The human herd recently zoomed past 7.7 billion. Should current cropland be used for producing
more food, more fiber, or more urban spawl?
Oil is a finite nonrenewable resource, and the mother of polyester. The easy to extract oil is about gone, and
what remains is increasingly expensive to produce. Resource limits guarantee that the plastic
clothing era has an expiration date. All
industrial scale apparel production is ecologically unsustainable. On the bright side, neither cotton nor
polyester biodegrade when buried in landfills.
So, the latest fashions in coming decades might be mined from dumps.
Will climate change solve this challenge by transforming snow
country into a toasty tropical nudist colony?
Our ancestors once lived like the San people of the Kalahari, in a
time-proven low impact manner. Their way
of life was leisurely compared to the workaholics of snow country. The San had no need to spend much of their
lives spinning and weaving. They had no
need to construct sturdy warm cottages.
They had no need to produce and store surplus food for consumption
during the icy months. They had no need
for herding livestock, or planting crops, or mining minerals, or building
cities. Imagine that.
St Clair, Kassia, The
Golden Thread: How Fabric Changed History, John Murray, London,
2018.
4 comments:
Another wonderful review, Rick!
~ Michael and Connie
Glad you liked it! Thanks!
your review of The Golden Thread is gentler than mine would have been. That you found out about in an article is disturbing if The Golden Thread has become a primary source. It is interesting that when she had the opportunity to name the contemporary weavers working on the reproduction Viking sails she didn't bother nor identify any of a large number of female archeologist whose research she pinned (Pinterest with no photos) on her pages
Hi Joe! Well, being blissfully ignorant about the politics behind the polyester curtains, I enjoyed the book a lot. Lots of good information for the work I’m doing. All the best!
Post a Comment