Steven Koonin’s Unsettled is an unsettling
book. I learned about it via a Facebook
post, clicked my way over to Goodreads, and listened to the reader comment jungle
drums. Folks seemed to like it. A few climate deniers wrote that the book had
convinced them that the climate was actually warming. Wow!
What could a book say that might communicate with them? I promptly downloaded a copy of the Kindle
version.
Koonin is a physicist who has worked for BP, Obama’s
Department of Energy, and in academia.
He enjoys an unblemished reputation as a contrarian. For him, climate change is “a possible future
problem.” The mainstream mindset
constantly tells us that the science on climate change is settled (huge
threat!). Koonin insists that “The
Science” is unsettled — reputable climate science has been highjacked by doom
mongerers (but he does acknowledge that the climate is indeed warming). The Trump administration once wanted to use
him in a proposed media campaign to challenge mainstream perceptions about
climate change.
Koonin is an expert at computer modelling, and he’s very
interested in climate science. Models
are given a set of rules, and then selected data is fed into them for
processing. If significant trends
appear, they can provide a basis for projections of the future. Armed with compelling graphs, and a blizzard
of statistics, he shines a spotlight on little known truths. For example, “The net economic impact of
human-induced climate change will be minimal through at least the end of this
century.”
Actual reality is more complex than a collection of data
points. In the Arctic, bright white
surfaces, like snow and ice, are very reflective (high albedo). Earth is bathed with incoming solar heat
every day, but albedo bounces about 30 percent of the heat back into outer
space, so we don’t bake. Darker
surfaces, like forests or open water, reflect much less heat (low albedo). The 70 percent of solar heat that reaches the
planet surface helps to keep the climate at temperatures that enable life as we
know it. This is an amazing balancing
act.
Because the climate is warming, especially in the Arctic, the
glaciers, ice pack, and sea ice are busy melting and retreating — exposing darker
surfaces, like dry ground and seawater.
So, less heat is bounced away, and more is absorbed, leading to rising
temps. The warmer it gets, the faster
the melting, which raises the warming, which speeds the melting — a vicious circle.
The atmosphere also plays a starring role in the balancing
act. Greenhouse gases include carbon
dioxide (CO2) methane (CH4), nitrous oxide (N2O),
and water vapor (H2O). In the
atmosphere, they provide a comfortable insulating blanket that retains much of
the heat radiating upward from the Earth’s surface. This process beneficially contributed to the balancing
act until the industrial era, when greenhouse gas emissions intensified, and
heat retention began increasing.
Warming affected permafrost.
Consider the area of the 48 U.S. states that lie between Canada and
Mexico. In the Northern Hemisphere,
permafrost underlies an area almost 2.5 times as large as the 48 states. In the Arctic, vast deposits of it, which can
be many thousands of years old, exist beneath both dry ground and offshore
waters. Permafrost is a mix of frozen
soil and organic material (plant and animal).
When it warms, it thaws (not melts).
With thawing, land that was once strong and solid becomes
more pudding-like. Towns decompose,
villages slide into the sea, pipelines fall apart, and hills release landslides
(exposing mammoth bones). Microbes feast
on the defrosted organic matter, and then emit methane. Methane is an extremely potent greenhouse
gas. In the atmosphere, it survives for
7 to 10 years before breaking down into CO2, which is less potent,
but can remain airborne for many centuries.
On the bottom of northern seas, permafrost lies beneath layers
of sediment. Sediments contain frozen
crystals of methane hydrates (or clathrates), which look like ice, but can burn. Seabed hydrate deposits in the Arctic are
estimated to contain 13 times the amount of carbon that’s currently present in
the atmosphere. As rising temps melt the
bright surface of sea ice, darker seawater becomes exposed to daylight, and
absorbs heat. When seabed waters warm, the
crystals melt, and methane gas is released.
In deeper waters, the plumes of methane bubbles dissolve while rising. In shallow waters, methane bubbles make it to
the surface, and enter the atmosphere.
As the Arctic climate continues warming, it’s possible that a
catastrophic release of methane could be triggered. Folks who pay attention to this stuff are
nervous. They are monitoring the East
Siberian Arctic Shelf — 810,000 square miles (2.1 million km2) of
shallow waters in methane country. The
shelf covers an area more than five times larger than California.
So, why don’t we just slow down greenhouse gas
emissions? Here, we collide head-on with
a monumental bummer. Koonin wrote (2020)
that in the atmosphere, CO2 levels are 415 parts per million
(ppm). Each year, about 37 billion tons
of CO2 are emitted. At this
rate, the concentration in the atmosphere would increase by about 2 ppm in a
year. Year after year, more is
added. These emissions remain in the
atmosphere for centuries (!) — so their concentration continuously grows. He calculated the trajectory of current greenhouse
gas emissions, and concluded that they would double by 2075.
In his book, The Great Acceleration, environmental
historian J. R. McNeill said it differently, “Some proportion, perhaps as much
as a quarter, of the roughly 300 billion tons of carbon released to the
atmosphere between 1945 and 2015 will remain aloft for a few hundred thousand
years.” By 2008, concentrations had
grown by 25 percent in just 50 years. Of
the emissions caused by humans, about 85 percent was related to fossil fuels.
Koonin contemplated where the path of continuous accumulation
would lead. He reflected on humankind’s
massive addiction to fossil fuels. Would
we ever willingly back away from our high impact way of life, as long as it’s
still possible? No! We’ll bet heavily on hope, and patiently wait
for technological miracles, until the lights go out. Suddenly, a divine revelation arrived. The notion that we could stabilize current CO2
emissions in the coming decades was simply not plausible — and forget actually
reducing them.
“Modest reductions in emissions will only delay, but not
prevent, the rise in concentration.” If greenhouse
gases continue their out of control accumulation, less heat will escape, the
climate keeps warming, the Arctic keeps melting, albedo keeps decreasing, and
the climate keeps getting warmer and warmer. We’ve started something we can’t stop. Yikes!
Never fear! Koonin pulls three “solutions”
out of his magic hat.
Solar Radiation Management (SRM) would artificially increase
albedo by frequently dispersing tons reflective substances high in the sky,
year after year, forever. The Artic would
quit melting, and humankind could live happily ever after.
Carbon Dioxide Removal (CDR) uses technology to extract the
surplus CO2 from the atmosphere, and put it somewhere secure, where
it will cause no mischief for a million years.
A few small pilot projects are underway, and they have serious limitations
so far.
Geoengineering is a word used to describe processes like SRM
and CDR. If one or both turn out to be miraculously
successful, humans could, in their wildest dreams, continue burning fossil energy,
and living like there’s no tomorrow. In
reality, neither is a proven success, nor cheap, easy, or sustainable. Both ideas make lots of people nervous, for a
wide variety of intelligent reasons.
Unintended consequences are guaranteed.
Luckily, there is one tried and true, all-purpose solution
that humans have relied on for countless thousands of years — adaptation. Courage!
Migrate to a region where you won’t starve, turn to ice, roast alive, or
drown in rising seas. Learn how to
walk. Become a great forager. And so on.
Doom mongerers warn that human influences will eventually
push the climate beyond a tipping point, at which time catastrophe will ring
our doorbell. Koonin writes that it’s
unlikely that human influences will push the climate over a tipping point. “The most likely societal response will be to
adapt to a changing climate, and that adaptation will very likely be
effective.” If adaptation isn’t enough,
we can always throw all caution to the wind, and fool around with
geoengineering.
So, Koonin introduced readers to the notion of albedo, rising
temperatures, melting Arctic, less albedo.
Great! He came extremely close to
the powerful punch line, but then suddenly swerved off into a head spinning whiteout
blizzard of statistics and graphs. His viewpoint
is based on data collections — statistics on temperatures, precipitation,
storms, etc. — stuff that computers can process (36 red dots, 55 blue dots…).
A great benefit of Kindle books is that they are
searchable. I searched the book for a
number of essential climate science keywords, and discovered zero hits for:
Peter Wadhams (Arctic researcher), permafrost, methane hydrate, methane clathrate,
methane craters, ocean acidification, ocean deoxygenation, East Siberian Arctic
Shelf, pine beetles, tree death, threshold temperatures (too hot for
agriculture), etc. A whole bunch of essential
information is absent in the book, and it may be an invisible elephant in the
room. Could doom mongerers actually be reality
mongerers?
Reading this book was an interesting experience for me. It made me question my views (all survived). I learned a few new things. Koonin is a purebred scientist, absolutely
dedicated to the holy quest for truth.
The long and winding upward path to sacred certainty passes through
numerous challenges and arguments that eventually weed out the dodgy ideas. The Steven Koonin article in Wikipedia [HERE] provides
ringside seats to the debate — links to commentaries by some of his critics who
also have respectable credentials.
Koonin, Steven E., Unsettled, BenBella Books, Inc.,
Dallas, Texas, 2021.
No comments:
Post a Comment