Professor Jared Diamond did research in New Guinea, and
became buddies with many natives. One
day, a lad asked him why some societies became so rich, and others did not. Why are there haves and have-nots? White folks with European ancestors have done
better economically than folks in New Guinea, and many other regions. To a number of dodgy white gits, this was absolute
proof of their racial superiority. Diamond
disagreed and explained why in his bestselling Pulitzer Prize winning book, Guns, Germs, and Steel.
White folks did not become dominators via divine blessings,
or genetic perfection. They were simply
the winners of a lottery named geography, folks who happened to live in the
right place at the right time. This
provided them with big advantages over societies of equally intelligent people,
of all other races, who had not won the lottery.
Human history is a story that is maybe five million years
old, and it sprouted in our African motherland.
For almost the entire saga, our ancestors were hunter-gatherers who
developed a low impact mode of living. By
and by, the ancestors migrated into Asia, Australia, and Europe, where they invented
clever new tricks for surviving in unfamiliar places.
For Diamond, the excrement hit the fan when the Ice Age rode off into the sunset, and the planet warmed up and
stabilized. At that time, the Fertile Crescent was a fabulous place to
live, situated between Europe and China.
It was home to large herds of gazelles, and grasslands loaded with wild
wheat, barley, and peas. Of course, abundant
food tends to stimulate population growth.
Eventually, the number of mouths reached the point where wild food
resources became strained. Around 7500
B.C., farming and herding began displacing hunting and foraging. Food production was the ominous first step on
the bloody path to guns, germs, and steel.
Most of the wild grass species that produce large seeds live
in Mediterranean climates, and the Fertile Crescent was especially blessed with
these plants. It was home to several
grain and legume species that were suitable for domestication. An acre of domesticated wheat could produce
10 to 100 times more nutrients than an acre of wild grassland. This was a unique situation. In our African motherland, which was south of
the equator, the number of food plants suitable for domestication was zero.
Of all the species of large herbivores in the world, only
fourteen were suitable for domestication.
One lived in South America, and thirteen in Eurasia. Diamond listed the traits that made a wild
animal suitable for domestication, it “must be sufficiently docile, submissive to
humans, cheap to feed, immune to diseases, grow rapidly, and breed well in
captivity.” The Fertile Crescent was unusually
lucky to be home to four wild animals that eventually became the most important
domesticated livestock of all: goats, sheep, pigs, and cattle. This was a unique situation.
In our beloved African motherland, zero large herbivores were
suitable for domestication. Zebras were
so wary of hungry lions that they refused to be owned and controlled. The older the zebra, the meaner. The guinea fowl was the only animal that all
experts agree was originally domesticated on the continent. Thus, if humankind had remained in home sweet
home, with nothing to eat but wild organic foods, we’d likely still be wild and
free today, and Detroit and Paris would be hangouts for mammoths and buffalo.
Livestock provided folks with meat, milk, fertilizer, hides,
wool, and muscle power. When animals
were milked, they provided herders with far more lifetime calories than could
be consumed by simply killing and eating them.
In different regions, folks milked cows, sheep, goats, horses, reindeer,
water buffalos, yaks, and camels. Folks
also rode on the backs of horses, donkeys, yaks, reindeer, and camels. Mounted cavalry radically redefined the rules
for warfare and raiding. Beasts of
burden were used to pull plows, carts, and sleds, and to haul loads of cargo on
their backs.
A serious downside of keeping livestock was being in constant
close contact with large herds of animals.
Many herders lived and slept close to their critters. This encouraged a number of animal pathogens
to adapt to human hosts, like influenza, smallpox, tuberculosis, plague,
measles, and cholera. As rising food
production encouraged the emergence of civilizations and cities, this created
perfect conditions for epidemic diseases, which thrive in filthy crowds.
After Columbus landed in America, maybe 90 percent of Native
Americans perished from Old World diseases.
Indians didn’t have similar diseases to share with the white folks,
because they kept few domesticated animals.
Llamas and alpacas lived in small herds, and only in the Andes. They didn’t live in close contact with
people, and people didn’t drink their milk.
The big idea in Diamond’s book was about the axis of
continents. In Africa and the Americas,
the land base was taller than wide, spanning multiple climate belts. This north-south axis presented obstacles for
the easy movement of people, livestock, crops, technology, and ideas. From north to south in Africa, the belts were
Mediterranean, Saharan, rainforest, savannah, and Mediterranean.
Eurasia had a huge land base, spanning from France to
China. Generally, tropical climates
(mostly hot) are found near the equator, arctic climates (mostly cold) are
close to the poles, and temperate climates (hot & cold) are found between
them. Food production and civilization
emerged in the Fertile Crescent, which had a temperate climate. The east-west axis of Eurasia made it easy
for people, livestock, crops, technology, and ideas to spread across the vast
temperate zone.
The early farmers and herders of the Fertile Crescent were
living in a new-fangled way, with no traditional wisdom to guide them. They began a reckless joyride in trial and
error, and gained tremendous expertise in error. The forests were mowed down, and erosion
plugged up the valleys and harbors.
Irrigation systems eventually made the soil so salty that it became
infertile. Ravenous goats hungrily
sabotaged nature’s every effort at healing.
Over time, paradise largely became a desert wasteland. So, many survivors packed up and migrated to
new homes. Some went east to China,
others went west to Europe. Their
brilliant plan was to repeat the same mistakes.
In China, folks grew millet in the north, and rice in the
south. Innovators developed a number of
important technologies, like gunpowder, cast iron, navigation, paper, and
printing. But you are not gazing at
Chinese characters right now, because they did not colonize the world. China unified their empire in 221 B.C., and
its culture was conservative — don’t rock the boat! Job One was to maintain order across the
large complex society, so the friendly tax collectors could safely visit
everyone.
Europe, on the other hand, was a chaotic wild west — politically
fragmented and terrifically competitive.
In 1500, it was home to maybe 500 smallish states, spread out across
many islands, peninsulas, and mountain valleys.
Each was a hub of innovation. Job
One was to avoid getting exterminated by ambitious enemies, and Job Two was to
exterminate enemies at every opportunity.
There was a nonstop arms race to develop more and better
weapons, fortifications, ships, steam engines, and so on. Technologies and ideas moved with great speed
back and forth across the continent.
Consequently, Europe was the region that colonized the world, spreading
across the temperate regions of North America, South America, northern and
southern Africa, southern Australia, and so on.
Anyway, Diamond presented many competent answers to the
question of why some societies are haves, and others are have-nots — mission
accomplished. I’ve only mentioned a few
of his many points here. The black hole
in the book is a more important question.
The book presumes that it’s cool that some societies are in the “haves”
category. Ecological sustainability is
off the radar.
There is one sentence with a whiff of doubt: “If those first
farmers could have foreseen the consequences of adopting food production, they
might not have opted to do so.” Obviously! The twenty-first century way of life would
have totally terrified them, an overwhelming horror show of unimaginable
craziness and destruction. Of course, the
book was written in 1997, when Earth was home to a wee herd of 5.8 billion. In those days of love and innocence, climate
change and energy limits were still largely paranoid fantasies among the
lunatic fringe.
But Diamond thoroughly understood the dark side of the
“haves.” Ten years earlier, he wrote an
essay, The
Worst Mistake in the History of the Human Race. He said, “Recent discoveries suggest that the
adoption of agriculture, supposedly our most decisive step toward a better
life, was in many ways a catastrophe from which we have never recovered. With agriculture came the gross social and
sexual inequality, the disease and despotism that curse our existence.”
Every year, thousands of college students are required to
read Guns, Germs, and
Steel. They are spending a
fortune on tuition, hoping to devote their lives to climbing up the
hierarchies, living as lavishly as possible in the Empire of the Haves, and
overloading landfills with the discards of their infantile opulence. They are not being prepared for the advancing
storms that will eventually pummel their generation.
Diamond added an afterword section to the 2003 reprint of his
1997 book. Bill Gates loved it. Diamond was contacted by numerous corporate
leaders seeking guidance. “What is the
best way to organize human groups, organizations, and businesses so as to
maximize productivity, creativity, innovation, and wealth?” Our culture’s worldview only has one channel,
perpetual economic growth — another joyride having no guidance from traditional
wisdom. Full speed ahead!
Diamond, Jared, Guns,
Germs, and Steel, W. W. Norton & Company, New York, 1997.
National Geographic produced an excellent three-part (3 hour)
documentary on Jared Diamond and his book.
Go HERE.
1 comment:
Hi, Just found your blog via a link from In Transition blog. Will enjoy reading through past posts. Just bought your book, What Is Sustainable. So many people have no understanding of the concept.
Post a Comment