[Note: This is the sixteenth sample from my rough draft of a
far from finished new book, Wild, Free, & Happy. I don’t plan on reviewing more books for a
while. My blog is home to reviews of 201
books, and you are very welcome to explore them. The Search field on the right side will find
words in the full contents of all rants and reviews, if you are interested in
specific authors, titles, or subjects.]
Food
Storage
In the tropics of Mother Africa, meat spoiled quickly, and
yummy carcasses soon attracted mobs of ravenous and dangerous scavengers. When folks fancied a juicy steak, they killed
something. Preserving and storing surplus
meat was unnecessary, and highly impractical, a stupid idea that never occurred
to anyone. There was no reason to hunt
heavily for a while, dry lots of meat, haul it around, and constantly protect
it.
Snow country was a different story. Winter made travel, hunting, and fishing more
difficult. Folks who accumulated and
stored surplus food for the winter months were far more likely to survive and
inhale the fragrant aromas of blooming springtime flowers. For our human ancestors, fine-tuned for
tropical living, long-term food storage was a weird and unnatural idea. But once some pioneers learned how to do it,
far more regions became potential locations for future colonization. With storage, we were able to expand into
lands having harsher climates.
Clive Finlayson jabbered about a group of humans known as the
Gravettian culture, who managed to survive in the steppe-tundra of the Eurasian
Plain from 30,000 to 20,000 years ago.
Large game was abundant. Here
they invented one of the most diabolical Earth-shaking technologies of all time
(gasp!), the storage pit! Holes chopped
into the frozen permafrost could be used as scavenger-resistant deep freezers,
to store surplus food for the lean seasons.
Finlayson believed that food storage was a significant
milestone on our long and painful descent to modernity. Surplus made clans more secure, as long as
adequate food resources remained available.
Acquiring surplus food for winter dining required intensified hunting,
which could lead to waste, spoilage, unintentional overhunting, population
growth, and the depletion of game over time.
An additional quirk of snow country was that folks needed to
burn lots of calories to stay warm and strong in their physically active
outdoor life. So, a diet rich in fat was
essential. The fat content of game
animals varied with the seasons. Meat
had the most fat in late summer and autumn.
In late winter and spring, many animals were unfit to eat due to
insufficient fat. In lean seasons,
Native Americans killed buffalo just to eat their tongues, which were high in
fat.
Dixie West noted that animals with minimal fat were junk
food. When humans and other carnivores
eat lean meat, they can lose weight, because digesting it requires more energy
than the meat contains. Folks commonly
smashed and boiled the bones that contained the most marrow, to extract the
precious marrow fat.
In snow country, as long as large game remained readily
available, labor intensive agriculture made zero sense. As game became scarcer, hunting was gradually
displaced by farming. This began about 6,000
years ago. In regions less suitable for
farming, hunting persisted longer. The
focus shifted from storing meat to storing grain. According to Finlayson, the concept of
producing surplus food, and competently managing the surplus, set the stage for
the birth of civilization.
The advantages of food storage in snow country encouraged the
dawn of the “more is better” mindset, which eventually became a core belief in
cultures engaged in agriculture or herding.
The Gravettians and other hunters stockpiled frozen or dried meat. Farmers loaded granaries with calorie dense
grains. Herders stored their meat on the
hoof, gathered milk daily, and slaughtered livestock only when needed. They strove to accumulate as many animals as
possible. In different forms, the practice
of food storage spread across snow country, eventually crossing from Siberia
into the Americas.
Life was simpler for tropical hunter-gatherers, like the San
people of the Kalahari. On a really
crappy day, if a gang of hyenas snatched an antelope just killed by hunters,
what was lost was merely the work of a single day. They were able to maintain their conservative
traditional way of life for many, many thousands of years. It was not a high impact way of life.
For the food hoarders of snow country, on the other hand,
misfortune could suddenly eliminate months of tedious work, and endanger winter
survival. Their food stockpile could be
wiped out by fire, flood, scavengers, spoilage, vermin, theft, and so on. The whole community might starve and blink
out. Over the long run, “more is better”
cultures, with their denser populations, were more likely to swerve into bloody
turbulence. Storage is big juju.
Dress
for Success
Hunter-gatherer cultures differed widely in their dependence
on technology. The utterly simple
Kalahari way of life was practiced by our hominin ancestors for at least two or
three million years. In the tropics of
Mother Africa, evolution spent several million years fine tuning our bodies for
life on the savannah, and the result was an excellent design.
After hominins migrated out of Africa, and colonized tropical
Asia and Australia, some folks decided to wander north. It was a cool place to live, and the farther
north they wandered, the cooler it got.
In snow country, tropical primates were like fish out of water. Brrrr!
They wrapped themselves in animal hides, lived in protective shelters,
and huddled around warm campfires.
In 1908, Knud Rasmussen told the story of a Greenland Eskimo
named Qumangâpik, who had four wives and 15 children. The first wife froze to death, the second was
buried by an avalanche, the third died of illness, and the fourth froze to
death. Of his 15 children, one starved,
four were frozen, and five died of illness.
Then, Qumangâpik froze to death, with his wife and two little
children. Three of his kids outlived
him. In frigid times, ripped or
inadequate clothing could be a death sentence.
Over time, early colonists in snow country learned how to cut
and sew hides into custom tailored clothing that provided better protection for
both humans and their body lice companions.
Killing a deer, tanning its hide, and turning it into coats, trousers,
hats, or footwear, was a time consuming process. Deerskin attire was not especially warm,
especially when soaking wet or frozen. On
the plus side, it could be boiled and eaten when starvation threatened.
The first stitching was likely done with sinew, or thin
strips of leather. Eventually, some
groups learned how to spin plant fibers into thread, which could be used for
stitching seams together. In the
Republic of Georgia, researchers have found spun and dyed fragments of flax
fibers that were 34,000 years old.
Needles were used for sewing clothing and tents, and for
making nets. Animal bone needles with
eyes, about 25,000 years old, have been found in Central Europe. Needles have not been found at Neanderthal
sites yet, but looking for a needle in a haystack is far easier than finding an
extremely old needle buried somewhere on the Eurasian land mass.
Over time, folks got better at spinning different types of
high quality thread. It was spun from
plant fibers like flax, cotton, or hemp; or animal fibers like wool. Eventually, a clever person invented weaving,
a process that wove thread into cloth.
Cloth could be used to make a wide variety of useful things.
Kassia St Clair described how gathering and processing plant
fibers was time consuming. So was
carefully collecting and preparing fibers from sheep, goats, silkworms, and
others. So was spinning and weaving. In some regions, folks may have devoted more
hours to their wardrobe than to acquiring food.
For hardworking people, clothing was precious, and carefully kept mended
and patched. Many owned little more than
what they were wearing.
During the agricultural era, wool clothing was popular in
snow country, until the eighteenth century, when new technology made cotton
cloth cheaper to make, and more profitable.
Cotton was the dominant fabric until the 1970s, when synthetic fibers
rose to dominance. It won’t be long now
until almost all clothing is polyester, which is exceedingly cheap to produce
from petrochemicals using state of the art automation, and super cheap
sweatshop labor.
Today, many consumers own enormous wardrobes of apparel, much
of it rarely worn, if ever. Modern
attire is not designed for rugged durability, but to be rapidly mass produced, in
order to meet the demand for the latest trendy styles. Trendy styles have deliberately short
lifespans. This encourages radicalized
consumers to maximize their apparel purchasing.
For them, nothing is more embarrassing than to be seen wearing obsolete
fashions. Landfills are stuffed with
countless tons of formerly trendy attire.
Much of it is discarded while still in excellent condition.
Great
Leap Forward
A
number of thinkers have jabbered about a miraculous turning point in the human
saga. Before this event, humans were dim
witted, knuckle dragging, mouth breathing bubbas. And then — shazam! — we triumphantly glided
across a magic bridge, from the archaic era into the modern one. Our species was gaining momentum on the
treacherous path to technological utopia and ecological dystopia.
Jared
Diamond once speculated that if space aliens had visited Earth 100,000 years
ago, humans would have appeared to be nothing more than ordinary animals. But then, as the millennia passed, those
critters were acting less and less ordinary.
By 40,000 years ago, our modernizing ancestors were demonstrating
revolutionary changes that were both beneficial and risky. What happened? Diamond named this miracle the Great Leap
Forward.
Of
course, Diamond was raised in a crazy self-destructive wonderland of high
technology — extremely clever stuff that enabled humankind to beat the living
crap out of the planet’s ecosystems for no sane purpose. Actually, those “ordinary” two-legged
ancestors, observed by space aliens, were the one and only critters on Earth who
were capable of conjuring domesticated fire — a fantastically revolutionary
innovation. It was close to step one on
the long march to world domination.
For
Diamond, the act of routinely using domesticated fire seemed ordinary and insignificant. In his 1992 reality, even four-year olds
could easily burn down the neighborhood with a cheap disposable lighter. In addition to fire, the visiting space
aliens would have also seen that the two-legged critters were unique in their
ability to knap sharp stone tools, and manufacture assorted gizmos for hunting. Our hominin ancestors had been developing
these unordinary skills for more than two million years.
Extremely
weird was the fact that those fire critters were at the top of the food chain,
yet they had no serious fangs, claws, speed, strength, or size. All the other top predators had naturally
evolved some combination of those traits, gradually, over the course of
millions of years. But today, those
traditional natural predators are being pounded into oblivion via guns,
cyanide, habitat destruction, and so on.
There are not seven-plus billion lions and tigers and bears staring at
cell phones.
With
the Great Leap, humans began doing more and more things beyond what ordinary
animals did. They baked ceramic figurines
in kilns, made flutes, wore ornamental beadwork, sewed clothing, invented new
and improved tools, and built trophy homes with mammoth bone walls. These luxurious dwellings have been found in
Ukraine, Czech Republic, Poland, Romania, Belarus, and Russia.
Venus figurines have been found in Slovakia,
Italy, Austria, Russia, Germany, Czech Republic, Switzerland, France, Romania,
and Siberia. They were carved in
soapstone, steatite, sandstone, mammoth ivory, horse bone, serpentine, black
jet, antler, limestone, and hematite.
Venus figurines date from 30,000 to 10,000 years ago.
Folks
learned how to process red and yellow ochre, hematite, manganese oxide, and
charcoal into pigments useful for cave painting. Wild artists crawled far inside caverns with
torches, and painted gorgeous portraits of the sacred animals for which they
had the deepest respect and reverence.
Images included the horse, lion, auroch, rhinoceros, salmon, bear,
mammoth, buffalo, owl, hare, ibex, auk, weasel, reindeer, chamois, and
fox. Often, artists placed their spread
out hand against a wall, and sprayed paint over it, creating a hand stencil.
Those
folks did not spend most of their lives indoors, isolated from the wild
ecosystem, like astronauts in orbit.
They had no glowing screens.
Their world was entirely wild and alive, and they were intimately involved in it, every minute of every day, bloody hands and
all. The paintings celebrate their
sacred relationship with the animals that fed them, clothed them, and sometimes
killed them.
Prehistoric
cave art has now been found in every continent except Antarctica. In France and Spain, it has been found in
almost 340 caves. Famous sites include Chauvet in France (30 to 32 thousand
years ago), Altamira in Spain (15,000), and Lascaux in France (18,000). Recently, D. L. Hoffman’s team found paintings
in three Spanish caves that were more than 64,800 years old — about 30,000
years before the arrival of humans. This
was the Neanderthal era.
The
Great Leap Forward has also been called the Cultural Revolution or the
Cognitive Revolution. Cognition is about
thought, understanding, and knowledge.
Twenty years ago, some believed that the leap was the result of
miraculous genetic mutations that turbocharged our intelligence, but that
theory went extinct, for lack of convincing DNA evidence.
A
number of experts theorize that the leap was encouraged by powerful advances in
complex language and communication, but this is impossible to prove via
archaeological evidence. Spoken words
are not preserved in fossils. We may
have been singers and poets several million years ago. We’ll never know. Many primates and other animals are vocal.
Some
sort of Great Leap certainly occurred in snow country, maybe between 50,000 and
30,000 years ago. Our tropical primate
ancestors were excited to discover lands loaded with abundant food, but
challenged by a life-threatening climate for which evolution had not prepared
them. The only way they could stay, and
feast on the delicious wildlife, was to cleverly invent a collection of
prosthetic technology that would increase the odds of winter survival. Eventually, the accelerating pace of cultural
evolution enabled us to conquer the planet, explode in numbers, and savagely
vandalize Earth in every imaginable way.
While
many of the innovations of the Great Leap were survival-oriented prosthetics,
others were not. Painting,
ornamentation, figurines, flutes, and so on were probably motivated by
spiritual affairs, or the desire for enjoyment.
Obviously, for a while, these were not folks who were desperately
struggling to survive. Their new
indulgences would seem to indicate that these folks were living in a bubble of
affluence, leisure, and decadence. They
had learned and refined the skills of survival, and their food resources were
temporarily abundant. They were rich. Life was good.
They
remind me of America’s baby boomer generation, of which I am a member. We were born at a time when industrial
civilization soared to ridiculous excesses, fueled by an orgy of consuming enormous
amounts of premium quality nonrenewable resources, as if they were
infinite. Some have called this joyride
in self-destruction “The Blip” — a brief extreme spike in many trend lines,
something equivalent to an asteroid strike.
History
repeatedly reminds us that high impact lifestyles always have an expiration
date. Yet, despite being proud
descendants of the Cognitive Revolution, our clever minds routinely refuse to
comprehend this simple and vital idea. Magical
thinking is always an effective cure for the unpleasant deliriums caused by occasional
whiffs of reality.
Anyway,
over the long run, was it truly a leap “forward” into greater joy, wisdom, health,
and sustainability? Or, was it something
else? When was the planet healthier and
happier?
4 comments:
I am writing a short novel (my ninth, in my language, just to keep my brain sharp with no hope of them being read more than a dozen people) with the moral that we do not know what to do with surplus – as individuals or nations.
During the thirty years after WW II when the US was flush with energy and materials, the surplus was not used to encourage women eduation (poor India had more women scholars and scientists at that time) or to improve the lives of black people. It was spent in developing TV, paving for cars and four wars killing millions of Asians.
Although my grand father lived in tropical South India he faced problems not much different from those you describe.
He wore two pieces of unstitched cotton cloth (grand mother only one). Stitching is for mending only. He hardly had spare money. His discretionary expenses (sign of economic prosperity) were old literary books and a small packet of snuff. Since November 15 through January 13 is inauspicious time, he was not called to conduct any Hindu rite and no income. My grand mother would keep dried rice and pulses, sun-dried vegetables and rice cakes. Though they were vegetarians, they consumed ghee (could be stored for weeks compared to butter) as a source of animal fat.
When I analyze the lives of people in that part of India I am of the opinion that their way of life would have continued for another thousand years, had the Europeans not come to colonize.
Thanks Amarnath! I’ve been learning as I write, and it’s been fun. I never realized how much northern people changed due to a temperate climate. They domesticated the livestock, began most agriculture, and built most of the early civilizations. You mentioned rice and cotton. Those two might have been wild indigenous plants in India, maybe. Many northern peoples definitely lived WAY too hard. Now Earth is wheezing.
Great post. What did cause that great leap (as we see now, into the abyss) forward? Temperate tool making unleashed a desire for control? This new mindset, when it traveled south again, was used to create a super-predator, eventually feeding on its own species as well as every other. Am I one of these beings/
Hi Kelpie! Greetings from Eugene. What caused the great leap? I don’t know if you’ve read all my samples. On the right side of my blog, posts are sorted by year and month. The samples begin in September 2018. My long answer is to read them, if you haven’t.
I’ll try a short answer. We know that humans have, over the last 300,000 years, developed many innovative strategies. These began from day one, and accumulated very slowly — they snowballed over the millennia, and the pace accelerated. My lifetime has been a whirlwind.
As far as I know, DNA research has not found evidence of a random mutation that catapulted us into miracle land. Complex language gave hominins huge advantages over other species, but nobody knows when this began. It could have been Erectus or Neanderthal. Moving from the tropical belt into temperate regions presented us with major survival challenges, which must have really cranked up the pursuit of innovations. This shift corresponds to most estimates of when the Great Leap occurred.
But the domestication of fire was a huge change. Complex language. Technological innovation. Sharp reduction in the number of man-eating carnivores. We eventually gained the ability to largely monopolize the resources in our ecosystems — a cardinal sin. We turned into control freaks. In an interview, Richard Manning once remarked on the era prior to plant domestication, “We didn't grow food; food grew.”
Are you a super predator? Wild, Free, and Happy rewrites the human saga. In it, humans are not the Crown of Creation. We began as ordinary animals, and sort of got lost and confused, and accidentally trashed the planet. Whoops! The dominant culture certainly behaves… ???... Predator is not a naughty word. Predators are wholesome, necessary, beneficial. Maybe you’re something else. Have a nice day!
Post a Comment